The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after some distance they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous found.
14. From the light from the position explained previously mentioned, it is actually concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his personal and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may perhaps seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety times for that department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed because of the respondent/Institute, these rules may well not have the operates within a transparent legal and regulatory framework from the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of read more what has actually been discussed above, without touching the merits in the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability from the petition is sustained and the petition is held for being not maintainable in terms of Article 199 from the Constitution for that reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio on the judgment passed through the Supreme Court while in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that when contemplating the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the benefit of all the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates that are found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked via the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.
whether though granting promotion senior employees were considered for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there might exist conflicts between the assorted lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered over the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father from the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is really an eyewkness of the incidence.
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were perfectly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Regardless of its popularity, hardly any may possibly concentrate on its intricacies. This article is definitely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section along with the particularly minimal threshold that governs it.
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness on the legislation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are set up by executive agencies based on statutes.